Difference between revisions of "Top 20 Validation Rule Failures (CBER)"

From PHUSE Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 6: Line 6:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| [[Validation_Rule_SD0006|SD0006: No baseline result in [Domain] for subject]] || SDTM requires baseline for EG, LB, QS, VS, not all TEST have a baseline || Validation rule and standard needs to align with use cases || Under Review || TBD || [[Validation_Rule_SD0006|Comment]]
 
| [[Validation_Rule_SD0006|SD0006: No baseline result in [Domain] for subject]] || SDTM requires baseline for EG, LB, QS, VS, not all TEST have a baseline || Validation rule and standard needs to align with use cases || Under Review || TBD || [[Validation_Rule_SD0006|Comment]]
 +
|-
 +
| [[Validation_Rule_SD0026|SD0026: Missing value for --ORRESU, when --ORRES is provided]] ||  ||  || Under Review || TBD || [[Validation_Rule_SD0026|Comment]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
| [[Validation_Rule_SD0029|SD0029: Missing value for --STRESU, when --STRESC is provided]] ||  ||  || Under Review || TBD || [[Validation_Rule_SD0029|Comment]]
 
| [[Validation_Rule_SD0029|SD0029: Missing value for --STRESU, when --STRESC is provided]] ||  ||  || Under Review || TBD || [[Validation_Rule_SD0029|Comment]]

Revision as of 15:23, 18 May 2012

SDTM Compliance

Rule Problem Proposed Solution Status Assignee Discussion
SD0006: No baseline result in [Domain] for subject SDTM requires baseline for EG, LB, QS, VS, not all TEST have a baseline Validation rule and standard needs to align with use cases Under Review TBD Comment
SD0026: Missing value for --ORRESU, when --ORRES is provided Under Review TBD Comment
SD0029: Missing value for --STRESU, when --STRESC is provided Under Review TBD Comment
SD0031: Missing values for --STDTC and --STRF, when --ENDTC or --ENRF is provided Data collection issue. In some cases caused by imputation of dates for ISO8601. Obtain understanding of how this check fires Under Review TBD Comment
SD0081: Observation date is after the latest Disposition date Under Review TBD Comment

Terminology Compliance

Rule Problem Proposed Solution Status Assignee Discussion
CT0037: Value for --BODSYS not found in (SOC) CT codelist Case sensitivity mis-match between CDISC Terminology and MedDRA
  • Ask CDISC team to change Terminology Codelist according to MedDRA SOC Terms, or
  • Use MedDRA SOC codelist for validation rather than C66783 codelist of CDISC Terminology
Under Review TBD Comment

Define.xml Compliance

Rule Problem Proposed Solution Status Assignee Discussion
DD0010: ODM attribute should not be included in Define.xml Under Review TBD Comment
DD0024: Invalid Codelist for variable Under Review TBD Comment



Back to Working Group 1:Data Validation and Quality Assessment Homepage


Last revision by Mkanevsky on 05/18/2012