Difference between revisions of "Talk:Semantic Technology Use Cases Catalogue"

From PHUSE Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Re: Proposed Use Cases -- ScottBahlavooni 10:08, 19 April 2013 (CDT))
(Represent the SDRG using Semantic Technology -- ~~~~: new section)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
Representing CDISC in RDF is interesting, but how could we go from RDF to SAS (or whatever technology is used to create datasets)
 
Representing CDISC in RDF is interesting, but how could we go from RDF to SAS (or whatever technology is used to create datasets)
 +
 +
== Represent the SDRG using Semantic Technology -- [[User:DanBoisvert|DanBoisvert]] 08:24, 23 April 2013 (CDT) ==
 +
 +
@kerfors mentioned the possibility of representing the [[Study Data Reviewer's Guide]] using semantic technologies.  This is beyond me, but sounds interesting.  And I quote (from Twitter) "How about a machine process-able Data Guide? In OWL/RDF & SPIN/RDF, see nice SPIN ex. http://topquadrant.com/products/SPIN.html"

Revision as of 08:24, 23 April 2013

Proposed Use Cases

  • Representing data standards (e.g. CDISC standards) as an ontology
    • Representing conformance checks in RDF
  • Supporting the development of therapeutic area content development including standards
  • Representing clinical trial data in RDF
  • Representing data exchange standards in RDF

Using RDF data in our Workflow -- DanBoisvert 13:28, 18 April 2013 (CDT)

Representing CDISC in RDF is interesting, but how could we go from RDF to SAS (or whatever technology is used to create datasets)

Represent the SDRG using Semantic Technology -- DanBoisvert 08:24, 23 April 2013 (CDT)

@kerfors mentioned the possibility of representing the Study Data Reviewer's Guide using semantic technologies. This is beyond me, but sounds interesting. And I quote (from Twitter) "How about a machine process-able Data Guide? In OWL/RDF & SPIN/RDF, see nice SPIN ex. http://topquadrant.com/products/SPIN.html"