Talk:Category Hierarchy

From PHUSE Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Is the list here a brain dump of possible topics? I would really like to keep the FDA Working groups partitioned so it is clear where they can be found. I think we have three high level groupings of wikis

FDA Working Groups

General PhUSE wikis

Conference Papers


Thoughts?

We have to think of a way to categorize data. Wikis aren't partitioned, per se, they are organized in a way that pertinent data can be found. Working Group pages, will all have the Category:Working Group. To me General PhUSE Wikis and Conference Papers are the same idea, but can be differentiated by a category (or hopefully a richer set of semantic descriptions...but we can deal with a category for now). Conference Papers would get Category:PhUSE2012. General wikis would be put into one of the categories that are listed on the page (CDISC, Coding Solutions).
We're still working on this.--Phusewiki 08:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)

I agree to Phusewiki. Also keep in mind that one article does not neccessarily only fit in one category. So a summary of a discussion club for Metadata at the conference in Budapest 2012 could have the following reasonable categories: "PhUSE Budapest 2012", "Metadata", "Discussion Club" --SaschaAhrweiler 07:44, 23 January 2012 (CST)

do we need sections for different programming languages?--Mfoxwell 10:13, 23 January 2012 (CST)