SEND Implementation User Group Minutes 2016-05-09

From PHUSE Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

When: 2016-03-07, 10:00am-11:00am EST
Place: Telecon



Participant Attended
Troy Smyrnios X
Audrey Walker
Bill Houser
Brian Argo
Carrie Neeley
Cheryl Sloan X
Christy Kubin
Dan Potenta
Debra Oetzman
Donna Danduone
Frederic Mura
Jamie Megna X
Jennifer Feldmann
Jeff Foy X
Kathy Powers
Kev Martin
Linda Hunt
Lou Ann Kramer
Louis Norton
Lynda Sands
Mike Wasko X
Pam Hills-Perry X
Peggy Zorn
Sarah Obbers
Wenxian Wang


Next meeting: 2015-06-06 10-11am EST

Meetings: 4 week schedule





Review Forum

  • METHOD CT Question
    • Answer added
  • Inhalation in EX Question
    • Not currently completely modelable in SEND, requires custom domain
    • No action
  • PP not done question
    • Leave as is, already answered, no faq item
  • MILAT question
    • Leave as is, already answered, no faq item
  • Deviations / not done question
    • Added some answers on deviations and not done

Review News Page

SEND Implementation News

  • Carryover*
    • Concept of shared industry calendar
      • Laura has a google calendar and is curating
      • Might be issue on ownership (plenty can update, but still one owner)
      • Ready for mass use
      • Would need steps for people who aren't familiar with
      • (ACTION ITEM - Laura) Set public settings?


  • Tumor.xpt item
    • Current wiki text says not required
    • Probably is still desired if not required by FDA
    • (ACTION ITEM - Troy) Get core team meeting item added for tumor.xpt expectancy
  • Handling of SEND in Study Documentation
    • Current text is now wrong, after some paradigm shifts/discussions/etc.
      • SEND datasets not done under the time span of the GLP study
      • but if datasets are used for interpretation, then they are part of the GLP study, and thus need to abide by all that entails
      • sponsor responsible for ensuring that the datasets accurately represent the study
    • Text from Debra:
      Appropriate verifications need to be done to ensure that data in the SEND datasets are an accurate representation of study data. A positive statement needs to be included in this section. In the event of a directed audit of the data set integrity, the actual verification documentation would most likely be helpful to the auditor.
      An example of a statement is:
      “Data in the SEND datasets are an accurate representation of the data for Study No. 12345. Any differences between the data sets and the report are described in section 6.2. Verification procedures and documentation supporting this are available upon request.”
    • (ACTION ITEM - ?) Update pages:
    • Defer for now - wait until SQA happens (right now - 4/4) - Bill, Jamie, Sue, etc.
      • (ACTION ITEM - Troy) Invite Bill, Jamie, Sue, Jen to 5/2 meeting
  • Known Issues
    • 3.0 items given a heading to make it clear they are 3.0 (because they are still valid for a while after 3.1 is in place)
    • Future evaluation of where errata go...

Action Items

Responsible Task Timeframe
 ? Update pages discussing QA/Validation/SD (see above) Next meeting
Bill Set up "SEND Calendar" / Talk with Laura about trying out wiki page Next meeting
Troy Get core team meeting item added for tumor.xpt expectancy Next meeting
Troy Reschedule next meeting (Memorial Day) Next meeting

Last revision by Troy.smyrnios, 2016-05-9